Guide · CTC Formation
How to form a Company Training Committee in Singapore.
CTC is the highest-subsidy SME grant in Singapore — 70% across four cost lines, S$300M fund running to 31 March 2028. But there's no open online application form. Here's the partner-walked process, the worker-outcome basis nobody publishes, and what to expect if you go through it.
Written 2026-06-02 · From a PMC-certified consultant who has been through CTC formation directly
TL;DR — the 6 things owners need to know
- No open application form. The process is partner-walked through e2i, U SME, or a consultant.
- Four funded cost lines — equipment, software, consultancy, training. Not just training.
- Worker outcome basis typically tied to the national average wage increment for the impacted role.
- Committee structure = CTC Senior Management Rep + NTUC/Worker Rep. Small, not a board restructure.
- Non-unionised firms are eligible — U SME (NTUC SME) acts as worker representative partner.
- 8–16 weeks end-to-end realistically — the time goes into the transformation plan, not the committee paperwork.
What is a Company Training Committee?
A Company Training Committee (CTC) is a joint employer + worker-representative body inside your company, formed under NTUC's framework. It's the structural requirement that makes your business eligible to apply for the CTC Grant administered by NTUC's e2i.
The committee is small — typically:
- CTC Senior Management Representative from your side (often the owner, MD, or COO)
- NTUC / Worker Representative — your union if you are unionised, or U SME (NTUC SME) if you are not
Both representatives sign off on the transformation plan and the committed worker outcomes. It is not a board restructure. It is a working committee that owns the transformation case and the worker-outcome accountability.
Why this grant exists (and why most owners under-use it)
The NTUC CTC Grant is part of a S$300 million Government commitment to scale CTCs from 2022 to 2028. The deadline was originally 31 July 2026 but has been extended to 31 March 2028.
Most owners never apply for two reasons:
- They think it's a training grant. It isn't — it's a transformation grant that funds equipment, software, consultancy and training. See /grants/ctc for the breakdown.
- They look for an application form and don't find one. CTC isn't self-serve. The process is partner-walked, and most owners assume that means "closed." It isn't.
The 4 supportable cost lines
All four cost lines must be tied to a transformation plan that produces both worker AND business outcomes:
- Equipment — physical hardware required for the transformation (machinery, devices, integration hardware tied to the redesigned workflow).
- Software — including AI tools, integration work, and custom software/IT outside the PSG vendor catalogue. This is where AI deployment lives.
- Consultancy — scoping, design, and workforce-redesign advisory. The consultant fee is itself eligible — rare across Singapore grants.
- Training — in-house at S$9/hour, or external non-SSG-supported courses tied to the project (up to 70% of course fee, caps may apply).
Subsidy ratio is up to 70% across all four lines — the highest of any general SME grant in Singapore.
The worker-outcome basis (the part not on the e2i website)
On paper, the 70% subsidy is the headline. In practice, the lever that decides the funding quantum is the committed worker outcome for impacted staff. That outcome is typically tied to the national average wage increment for the impacted role.
When the transformation lifts wages in line with the national average for the impacted function, the worker side of the case writes itself — and the funding case becomes substantially stronger. The corollary: if the transformation cannot credibly justify a wage outcome aligned with the national average, the funding quantum will be smaller, no matter how clean the business case looks.
This is the operating logic experienced applicants build around. It isn't spelled out in the public materials — you only learn it after going through the process or working with someone who has.
The partner-walked process (what actually happens, week by week)
- Weeks 1–2 — Form the committee. Identify your CTC Senior Management Representative. Engage NTUC (if unionised) or U SME (if not). Document the committee.
- Weeks 3–6 — Scope the transformation plan. This is the work. Identify the function being transformed, the impacted staff, the equipment/software/consultancy/training required, and the committed worker + business outcomes. Tie the worker outcome to the national average wage increment basis for credibility.
- Weeks 6–8 — Validate. The CTC Senior Management Rep and the NTUC/Worker Rep sign off on the plan. Both signatures are required for the application to proceed.
- Weeks 8–10 — e2i review. Engage e2i to review the application before submission. This pre-review dramatically improves the first-pass success rate and is effectively standard practice.
- Weeks 10–12 — Submit on grants.e2i.com.sg. Paper and email submissions have not been accepted since 1 January 2023.
- Weeks 14–18 — Letter of Award. Typically issued 4–6 weeks after a complete submission, assuming no major clarifications.
Total: 14–18 weeks from kick-off to Letter of Award, with the bulk of the time in the transformation-plan scoping (not the committee paperwork).
Stacking CTC with PSG, EDG and SFEC
CTC sits cleanly alongside other grants, provided scopes are separated and no cost is double-claimed:
- PSG — funds the off-the-shelf tools from the pre-approved vendor catalogue. See PSG.
- EDG — funds custom capability builds at IDP Stage 2 / Stage 3. See EDG.
- CTC — funds the four cost lines around the impacted workforce.
- SFEC — S$10k auto-credit covers 90% of out-of-pocket on training (expires 30 Nov 2026). Stacks on top of CTC training spend. See SFEC.
Net effective subsidy on a well-structured S$100k+ AI transformation often lands at 55–60% of total project cost when all four grants are stacked correctly. The strategic article covering the full decision tree: PSG vs EDG vs CTC — Which one should you actually apply for?.
Three common mistakes when forming a CTC
1. Treating CTC as a training grant only
Owners scope only the training spend and miss the equipment, software, and consultancy lines. Result: smaller funding envelope and a weaker business-case narrative.
2. Vague worker outcome
"Improved productivity" is not a worker outcome. Tie the committed outcome to a measurable wage or role-progression basis (typically the national average wage increment for the impacted role).
3. Skipping the e2i pre-review
Submitting cold to the portal without an e2i pre-review materially lowers first-pass approval. The pre-review is standard practice — use it.
A personal note
I've been through CTC formation and the e2i process directly. I'm not selling a CTC application service — and the public materials genuinely don't tell you what to expect, which is why so few owners get through it.
On a personal level, if you're considering CTC and want a walk-through of what to expect — what the worker outcome conversation actually looks like, how to scope the four cost lines around a real AI transformation, what the e2i pre-review tends to flag — feel free to message me. Happy to share what I learned.
Related grants
- CTC Grant Singapore — the canonical landing page for the grant itself
- EDG Grant Singapore — custom builds at IDP Stage 2/3, often paired with CTC
- PSG Grant Singapore — off-the-shelf vendor catalogue, paired with CTC for training
- SFEC — S$10k auto-credit on training spend, expires Nov 2026
- CCP — 90% salary support for reskilling mid-career hires
- PTRG — S$125k for senior worker (60+) re-employment
- PSG vs EDG vs CTC — Which one should you apply for?
Working through CTC?
Personal walk-through, no sales pitch.
I'm happy to share what the process actually looks like — partner selection, worker outcome framing, e2i pre-review. Not a paid service. Just a conversation.
No. Unlike PSG or EDG, CTC is not a self-serve portal grant. The process is partner-walked through NTUC's e2i, U SME (NTUC SME, for non-unionised companies), or a consultant who has been through it. Final submission goes through grants.e2i.com.sg, but you need a partner to scope, validate, and review before you submit. This is the main reason CTC is under-used across Singapore SMEs.
A Company Training Committee is a joint employer + worker-representative body inside your company, formed under NTUC's framework. It's not a board restructure — it's a small committee (typically a CTC Senior Management Representative from your side plus an NTUC/Worker Representative) that owns the transformation plan and signs off on the worker outcomes the CTC Grant commits to. The committee structure is what makes your application eligible under e2i's framework.
Realistically 8–16 weeks end-to-end, depending on how prepared the transformation plan is. Forming the committee itself is fast (1–2 weeks). The bulk of the time goes into scoping the transformation plan, defining measurable worker + business outcomes, validating with NTUC, and reviewing with e2i before submission. Expect a Letter of Award 4–6 weeks after a complete submission.
No. If you are unionised, your union helps form the committee. If you are non-unionised, NTUC SME (U SME) can assist as the worker representative partner. Either route lets you apply for the CTC Grant — the requirement is that the committee has both employer and worker representation, not that the company is unionised.
When the transformation commits to lifting impacted-staff wages in line with the national average wage increment for that role, the worker side of the case becomes credible without subjective negotiation. This is the under-discussed basis that makes CTC funding quantum stronger than a pure training grant — and it's not spelled out on the e2i website.
Yes. Consultancy is one of the four CTC-supportable cost lines (alongside equipment, software, and training). The consultant fee for scoping, designing, and supporting the workforce-redesign work is eligible — which is rare across Singapore grants and one of CTC's most underused features.
No specific industry restriction. Entities legally registered or incorporated in Singapore are eligible — companies, societies, non-profits, charities, social service agencies. Government bodies, statutory boards, and wholly-owned subsidiaries of Government are NOT eligible.
Stay sharp
The weekly Singapore grant playbook.
Operator-grade pieces on PSG, EDG, CTC, MRA and the rest of the stack — straight to your inbox once a week. No spam, no upsell.
One email a week. Unsubscribe in one click.
Sources, copyright & accuracy
Last reviewed: 2026-06-01
Data sources. All factual content on this page — grant rules, subsidy percentages, caps, eligibility criteria, vendor listings, prices, application process steps — is sourced from official Singapore government websites including EnterpriseSG, IMDA, GoBusiness, SMEs Go Digital, NTUC, the Business Grants Portal and related Singapore Government agencies.
Copyright.Copyright in the underlying factual information (programme rules, vendor names, prices, eligibility criteria) belongs to the Government of Singapore and the respective administering agencies. This site does not claim ownership over that material — it is republished here as a consultant's working reference under fair-use practice for educational and advisory purposes. The original editorial commentary, analysis, opinions, recommendations, frameworks, comparisons, tools and visual presentation on this site are the author's own work.
Accuracy. Grant rules, vendor catalogues and pricing change frequently. This site syncs from official sources periodically (last sync date shown above per page). Information may be out of date by the time you read it. Always verify the latest details on the official EnterpriseSG, IMDA, NTUC or BGP pages before submitting any application or making a financial decision. Nothing on this site constitutes legal, financial, tax or grant-approval advice.
No affiliation. drnicktung.com is independently operated and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or representing EnterpriseSG, IMDA, NTUC, the Government of Singapore or any listed grant vendor. References to government agencies and vendors are for editorial purposes only.
Errors or corrections? Spotted something outdated or wrong? Message me on WhatsApp and I'll fix it.